I still have my doubts about any federal efforts to help the housing market, but I am impressed by the planned expansion of the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP), detailed today by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA).
Those who think they might be affected should read the press release and then talk to their lenders.
In theory, the “enhanced” HARP should open the door for mortgage holders whose notes are backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac and who are current on their payments to refinance at the current low rates, no matter how far underwater they are.
Among the key elements of the expanded program (quoting from the press release):
- Eliminating certain risk-based fees for borrowers who refinance into shorter-termÂ mortgages and lowering fees for other borrowers;
- Removing the current 125 percent LTV ceiling for fixed-rate mortgages backed byÂ Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac;
- Waiving certain representations and warranties that lenders commit to in making loansÂ owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac;
- Eliminating the need for a new property appraisal where there is a reliable AVMÂ (automated valuation model) estimate provided by the Enterprises; and
- Extending the end date for HARP until Dec. 31, 2013 for loans originally sold to theÂ Enterprises on or before May 31, 2009.
- The mortgage must be owned or guaranteed by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae.
- The mortgage must have been sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac on or before MayÂ 31, 2009.
- The mortgage cannot have been refinanced under HARP previously unless it is aÂ Fannie Mae loan that was refinanced under HARP from March-May, 2009.
- The current loan-to-value (LTV) ratio must be greater than 80%.
- The borrower must be current on the mortgage at the time of the refinance, with noÂ late payment in the past six months and no more than one late payment in the pastÂ 12 months.
No, the enhanced HARP does not reduce principal, but encouragement to reduce the terms of mortgages could result in more homeowners reaching positive equity more quickly. Here’s a hypothetical case in the FHFA press release:
- Assume a homeowner currently has a mortgage on which he or she owes $200,000 andÂ has an interest rate of 6.5 percent â€“ a monthly payment of $1264. If the house is worthÂ $160,000, the homeowner has a current loan-to-value (LTV) ratio of 125 percent.
- If this borrower refinanced into a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage with an interest rate of 4.5Â percent, the monthly payment would decline to $1013. But, by refinancing into a 30-year loan, the borrowerâ€™s loan balance will not reach $160,000 for ten full years.
- If the borrower chose a 20-year loan term at a rate of 4.25 percent (mortgage rates tendÂ to be less for shorter term mortgages), the monthly payment would be $1238 ($26 lessÂ than the borrower currently pays) and the borrowerâ€™s loan balance would reachÂ $160,000 in five-and-one-half years.
- If this same borrower refinanced into a 15 year mortgage, assuming an interest rate ofÂ 3.75 percent, the monthly payment would be $1454 ($190 more than the currentÂ payment), but the loan balance would be below $160,000 in a bit more than three-and-one-half years.